Hi, Jim Fulton wrote: > Yes, now that you mention it. Proxies should be as transparent as > possible. As such, they shouldn't add additional attributes if they can > avoid it. I think it's best to leave things as they are, with a comment > pointing out that the difference is in the version of getProciedObject > used.
I wonder if that is only due to the use of proxies for security proxies. In this case I understand that the proxy needs to be as transparent as possible to avoid attack vectors on the proxy itself. For other proxies I could imagine that this isn't true. I think traversal proxies are one example. They would be fine if they were translucent not transparent, or not? Christian -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com