On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:05:32 -0000, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No-one who doesn't  
already read this list has heard of Zope 3 (as in, they understand what  
it's all about, and they understand the distinction between Zope 2 and  
Zope 3) and very few have heard of Zope in general. They have, however,  
seen all the Ruby-on-Rails demos and are talking about it all the time.


Yeah, but honestly I don't care. If people choose a technology on name
recognition and not on technical merit, then it is their bad. However, I
question the RoR hype. I wonder whether big companies seriously considering it; it has absolutely no track record. Zope 2 (and even 3) on the other hand
is deployed on many huge sites and the risk of deploying it is low. Even
deploying Zope 3 is a smaller risk than RoR.

And what if they've never heard about Zope 3 at all, what if it doesn't even come up in their discussions? The people that make the decisions don't necessarily have the time to research and try out every single framework out there. In fact, they almost never do.

The presumption that people will just "find" your technology may hold when there are only a few contenders, but there are dozens of web frameworks even in the python space, dozens more in the Java space, and don't even try to count the PHP ones. And there are many, many people who are approaching the search thinking they'd be more comfortable with PHP or Java (which they are more likely to have experience with than python) and think that, "if they don't even promote this on their own web site, it must be marginal thing that I shouldn't bother with."

This happens. Every single day. I think it's short sighted not to care. How much better would Zope be if it had more real use cases, more serious users and ultimately more contributors?

Why does Plone have so many users and such an active community? (hint: It's not because it's technology is de facto better than say CPSs...)

Note that I'm not saying that the same people who produce the code (and great code it is, which is why I care so much about this) should be doing this. In fact, the Plone experience tells us they probably shouldn't. But *someone* ought to, because it's a shame each time someone picks a less appropriate framework just because they didn't know Zope 3 existed or that it was complete (I didn't know it was complete until after Zope 3.1 was released, and I was actively writing Plone code at the time).

Martin

--
(muted)

_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users

Reply via email to