Benji York wrote:
David Pratt wrote:
You are probably right but just the same I'd rather see the patched
version for z3 also since I am certain this will become less obvious
over time if it is left the way it is.
Instead of maintaining a fork of docutils, Zope 3 should (and may
already, I haven't been keeping up with this issue) include tests to
make sure we're using docutils appropriately. Best of both worlds: we
have continued assurance we don't regress, and we don't have to maintain
a fork/patches.
Hi Benji. Fair enough. What about the idea of maintaining a text file in
the distribution specific to possible security issues. Is this worth
considering for historical purposes so they do not get lost over time or
implicitly understood by only a handful of people. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
_______________________________________________
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
