Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally
prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for
actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead
putting everything in site.zcml useful, because it's easier to see in
one place what's included and what not.

I certainly prefer this ;-)

That said, I do like Apache 2 - on - Debian's a2enmod, a2dismod, a2ensite and a2dissite. If Zope had equivalents, I'd probably flip round to the other view...


Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope3-users mailing list

Reply via email to