On Monday 02 April 2007 04:14, Jegenye 2001 Bt (Miklós Prisznyák) wrote:
> You can be very proud indeed! Having a quick look I can see it's a
> much-much cleaner implementation than tinyRML is.
Yes, it is. I just got tired looking at tinyRML and not being able to
effectively contribute because of the code.
> I had to look into
> that tricky code because I needed TOC which was not supported.
> Eventually I managed to make it mostly work somehow but it was kind of
> a horror story to understand how one can tweak that code. :p
It would be great, if you could port your TOC code to z3c.rml. I would welcome
good TOC support! :-)
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-users mailing list