Roger Ineichen wrote:
>> I need very basic content providers to generate HTML contents
>> from a set of classes, inside pages templates.
>> Is there a huge difference between using views (and
>> syntax) and using content providers (with "provider:providername"
>> syntax), mainly in terms of performances, CPU usage and/or
>> memory usage ??
>> Thanks for any advise for this simple "problem", as both
>> methods work perfectly...
> I do not recommend using views for content that is only
> used inside a template. Because "context/@@viewname"
> is also traversable as a real view and will probably show
> up in google.
How would it show up in Google? Google bots don't try arbitrary URLs, they
Using ordinary views for parts of a HTML page works perfectly for me.
Zope3-users mailing list