Roger Ineichen wrote: >> I need very basic content providers to generate HTML contents >> from a set of classes, inside pages templates. >> Is there a huge difference between using views (and >> "context/@@viewname" >> syntax) and using content providers (with "provider:providername" >> syntax), mainly in terms of performances, CPU usage and/or >> memory usage ?? >> >> Thanks for any advise for this simple "problem", as both >> methods work perfectly... > > I do not recommend using views for content that is only > used inside a template. Because "context/@@viewname" > is also traversable as a real view and will probably show > up in google.
How would it show up in Google? Google bots don't try arbitrary URLs, they follow links. Using ordinary views for parts of a HTML page works perfectly for me. Daniel _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
