Hi Christian, Thanks for the tips.
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 08:30 -0600, Christian Lück wrote: > But before, you should think about your schema again. It looks very > complicated to me. Many here and on the Grok list have suggested that I simplify the schema. However, the class and attribute names MUST comply with these specs: http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/roadmap.html I'm sure that the Dv ... classes will be turned into subclasses of Field at some point soon. > > Huh, that mixes content and layout/formatting. > Suggestion 1) Think of a vocabulary of text types where types are > defined by usage or some other non-layout but content-specific feature > and then write HTML-renderers for each type. The actual data that is assigned to these attributes come from one of thousands of sources. This is a reference model, not the actual data definition. > > class DvText(TextLine): > > """ > > blah blah! > > Write unittests instead of blahs. If you don't manage, improve your data > modell! The blah blah was just because I deleted A LOT of stuff because it wasn't germane to the email. :-) Thanks again, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
