On 11/21/05, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --On 21. November 2005 15:14:50 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Well, that would be cool. Just a question: How do you plan to keep and > > verify backwards compatibility? Any database, with any type of > > DateTime object, must work transparently. > > Perfect question. When we considered rewriting DateTime using mx.DateTime > in 2001 we could answer this question :-) That's why the rewrite never > happened. > Yes, it's probably easier to move the applictaion over to using datetime instead.
-- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
