Am Mittwoch, den 07.12.2005, 09:39 +0000 schrieb Chris Withers:
> Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > The original poster explained his wish to retain FCGI:
> > 
> >   It reuses an existing connection between Apache and Zope
> >   while (he thinks and I might believe it) the recommended
> >   "mod_proxy" way each time opens a new connection.
> > 
> >   Thus, FastCGI might be more efficient.
> Show me some evidence proving that fcgi or mod_proxy is the significant 
> limiting performance factor in a setup involving zope and I'll take this 
> seriously ;-)

The funny thing is - performance isnt really the pro of
fcgi over http. Its really more about transporting header
and environment data from zope to apache, which is
kinda limited with mod_proxy. (Think alternative
authentication, ssl )


Zope maillist  -
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to