On 12/17/05, Jan-Ole Esleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should be able to > design stuff incrementally with a little experimentation along the way > without constantly impending danger of it all crashing down on you.
I don't undertand why you say that this isn't possible in Zope. > That's how Python works, and RoR etc. In ZOPE, we're back to the > temptation to "just stuff a bunch of data into my object". And it's > not even obvious that this is a problem, because everything is so > tightly interdependent. It's exactly what Python usually avoids > ("explicit is better than implicit"). I agree that there is too much implicitness in Zope 2. I don't agree that persistance is a part of that. It isn't implicit at all. Maybe it's not easy to understand, but it isn't particularily implicit, and neither is it uncontrollable, as you seem to say. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )