Sascha Welter wrote: > (Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:11:00PM -0400) Jim Fulton wrote/schrieb/egrapse: >> I don't think we need A&B. Maybe just "Zope" and "Zope Framework". > > As long as both use the word "Zope", the confusion will continue.
Well, not quite, I think as long as any *one* of the bits uses the word "Zope" on its own, there will be confusion... > Why don't the Zope 3 people find a different name now, something that > relates but is not the same? I've already floated: Zope 2 the app server -> Zope Classic Zope 3 the app server -> Zope Advanced Andreas doesn't like the former and two of the main people I thought cared about "Zope 3 the app server" say they don't. More suggestions please! How about "Zope 2 the app server" -> Zope TAS 4.0? Or even Zope Taz 4.0? Then we get a cute mascot :-) > I understand that the developers would like everybody to move to shiny > new Zope 3 I don't think "the developers" actually care what you use ;-) > for a long time), those Zope 2 people won't move over by mistake. Even > new people (who Chris so much despises landing on Zope 2) That's not actually true, I just think it's evil to lead users down a path (Zope 2 the app server on its own) when there are better (Grok, Django, hell even Plone) available. cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )