2009/4/3 Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk>: > Lennart Regebro wrote: >> >> 1. The Zope Framework dependency cleanup project continues. When >> cleanup is deemed reasonably finished, we rename the framework Zope 4. > > Oh, so Zope 4 is a run on from Zope 2?
Eh... no. > How do I upgrade from Zope 2 to Zope 3? Eh... what's your point? > How about from 3.5 to 4? Should be reasonably easy. > Bream 4.0 would be fine with me for that, I don't think there seems to be > anyone who really cares about it anymore though... Possible. >> 3. Grok moves over either to Zope.pipeline or repose.bfg as publisher in >> Grok 2. > > Grok is Grok, Repoze is Repoze, lets leave them be and let them choose their > own names... Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. > It cannot be called Zope int(x) for any value of x for the reasons that cause > the current confusion. I think Zope Legacy 4 is a bit mean, I think there's > plenty more life in the project if people want there to be. That was why I > suggested Zope Classic (hey, it worked for Coke when they had to bring back > their original product because of a snafu on the supposed replacement!) Sure, Zope Classic works too. I don't like "Standard" because it makes it sound like it's preferred. > Bream 4 on top of Framework 4 > Standard 4(which would include Framework 4) > Plone 4 on top of Standard 4 > Repoze and Grok on top of Framework 4 Yup. Sounds good to me. As usual, I don't think any decisions should be taken. This is just what I would like to see. People either do it or do not. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )