+-------[ Dieter Maurer ]---------------------- | Andrew Milton wrote at 2009-4-11 21:46 +1000: | > ... | >So your position is, the code is fine, but, the docs suck so don't use | >it. Well the docs have always sucked, the zope-3 docs don't seem any | >better. Perhaps the people deprecating and removing interfaces willy-nilly | >should document the replacements and how to change over existing consumers | >of the removed interfaces, or re-implement the removed interfaces using | >"the new way." | > | >These are all issues for The Zope Foundation to address, not for you to | >badger individuals who don't agree with your dogma-de-jour. Badger the | >people responsible to do something. | | The people driving the Zope Foundation are (mostly) unfortunately heavily in | favour of what they call "cleaning up code" and removing backward | compatibility....
Yes the "improve with axe" methodology has never worked in any other project, I don't know why anyone thinks Zope2 would be different. I can see having to write a "shim" product to get existing code to keep working until there's time to fix it all. -- Andrew Milton a...@theinternet.com.au _______________________________________________ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )