Andrew Milton wrote:
> My position is that plenty of people use Zope 2 without plone,
Your position appeared to be that it's a good idea to tempt new users
into using "plain zope 2". I assert that it's not because zope.org is
dead, the docs have barely changed in 7 years and, in a specific case,
LocalFS has become unmaintained and doesn't work in current Zope 2 releases.
> | >I already maintain a lot of code,
> | such as?
> So you really don't go to zope.org.
That doesn't answer my question. What public code do you actively maintain?
> | >and I have my own LocalFS-type code so I
> | >don't see the need to maintain a different one.
> | Then why not release this and advertise is as a maintained alternative
> | to LocalFS?
> Why bother?
Because it's broken on current Zope releases and no-one is maintaining
it, meaning every person who wants to use it has to individually patch
it and maintain their own local copy.
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -