Review: Needs Information

> - What about those tests? All of them are fixed, as the remote queue shows,
> except for eqname-013, which is waiting on a W3C bug resolution.
OK. Maybe I don't understand how the RQ works. I was asking this because those 
tests are still part of the file test/rbkt/Queries/w3c_known_failures.txt. Is 
this file automatically maintained by the RQ in case of a progression?

> > - Nope, that query is not supposed to work. The new EQName syntax is
> Q{URI}localname, there is no colon.
That makes sense.
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.

Mailing list:
Post to     :
Unsubscribe :
More help   :

Reply via email to