> I will take a look of this but if I am not wrong the ones failing are not > actually using the function nilled. not sure why these tests are done for > nilled but I will take a look. Please look in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/revision/11279 Line 336 to 340, line 342, 344 and 345. Those are the 8 fn:nilled test cases I am referring to as still failing.
> And actually not only 7 tests were solved the whole function was actually > broken it had a behavior in which it always returned false so all the tests > that expected a false response were passing. After your fix, there were 7 progressions: Please see http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/revision/11279 Lines 333, 334, 335, 341, 343, 346 and 347. These are the 7 test cases I am referring to as progressions. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug1147563/+merge/153485 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp