On 7/2/19 12:09 PM, Abhisheyk Deb wrote:
Hi,
It turns out it was mistake from our end, we were checking too early
before the actual replication was done completely. Now that works
properly.
The direction of replication is from AD -> 389 DS
But now we have a new requirement which is to copy from multiple
Source Subtree from Windows to Linux.
To get both subtrees I used the winSyncSubtreePair multivalued attribute.
This is the replication agreement we have right now
dn:
cn=UsersSyncAgreement,cn=replica,cn=dc\=example\,dc\=com\,cn=mapping
tree,cn=config
changetype: add
objectclass: top
objectclass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement
cn: UsersSyncAgreement
winSyncSubtreePair:
cn=Users,dc=adexample,dc=com:ou=userandgroups,dc=example,dc=com
winSyncSubtreePair:
ou=ItalyGroups,dc=adexample,dc=com:ou=userandgroups,dc=example,dc=com
nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on
nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: on
nsds7WindowsDomain: adexample.com <http://adexample.com>
nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=example,dc=com
nsDS5ReplicaHost: adexample.com <http://adexample.com>
nsDS5ReplicaPort: 389
nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: LDAP
nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: cn=replication user,cn=Users,dc=adexample,dc=com
nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE
nsDS5ReplicaCredentials: secret
winSyncInterval: 1200
We want to copy both subtrees cn=Users and ou=ItalyGroups from the
AD to 389 DS subtree ou=userandgroups,dc=example,dc=com.
Once the 389 Directory Server is installed, and this replication
agreement is configured, I am able to access the 389 DS.
But once I initialize this replication agreement using the following
dn:
cn=UsersSyncAgreement,cn=replica,cn=dc\=example\,dc\=com\,cn=mapping
tree,cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: nsds5BeginReplicaRefresh
nsds5BeginReplicaRefresh: start
The dirsrv service crashes.
The server should not crash, can you please get a stack trace:
https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-crashes
Can you help me with this problem, Am I configuring something wrong in
the above replication agreement?
What if you remove the second winSyncSubtreePair attribute? I'm not
100% sure using more than one winSyncSubtreePair attribute works anyway
(I need to investigate that)...
But if you don't mind please get a stack trace so we can at least fix
the crash.
Thanks,
Mark
Thank you
Abhishek Deb
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:24 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de
<mailto:wbr...@suse.de>> wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2019, at 05:09, Abhisheyk Deb <abhisheyk...@gmail.com
<mailto:abhisheyk...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have the following setup.
>
> Active Directory Server in US.
> 389 DS Server in Italy.
>
> We are able to access the Active Directory Server from 389 DS.
> We installed the sync agreement. No body is touching the AD, the
number of objects that should copied is 21. But every time we are
running the replication agreement, the number of objects being
copied is always different. How can that be if there is no change
happening at the AD Server.
>
> Is the replication done over UDP or TCP.
>
> Also is it because of distance and delay that is causing the
synchronization issues.
>
> If some can elaborate in this issue, it would be really helpful.
Sorry for the very late reply,
Replication like this, can be partial - it may not send all
objects or structures, just ones defined in the agreement.
I think we'll need to see your winsync agreement from cn=config to
know more, and to see what kind of objects are being sent, and
what is not.
Is it objects from 389 to AD or in the other direction that
are/are not being synced?
Thanks,
>
> Thank you
> Abhishek Deb
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to
389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
