> does the git extension *require* bookmarks? yes.
and it wouldn't surprise me if the extension uses API functions new since 1.0.2. if you're going to bother bringing in a new version, you might as well pull in 1.3. but 1.2 would have worked. russ
> does the git extension *require* bookmarks? yes.
and it wouldn't surprise me if the extension uses API functions new since 1.0.2. if you're going to bother bringing in a new version, you might as well pull in 1.3. but 1.2 would have worked. russ