On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:19:58AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote: > > huh? what does libmach (which takes apart executables) > have to do with any of this? > Did I get the wrong impression when I perceived libmach, as released with GoLang - cause that's where I looked - seemingly quite capable of synthesising as well as analysing binary images?
++L
