the standard labs driver checks the speed during auto negotiation.
so it is often wrong.

- erik


On Feb 18, 2016 3:41 PM, arisawa <aris...@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> hello, 
>
> rtl8169 is popular in cheap MB, so it is installed in my many MBs. 
> however, cat /dev/kmesg claims: 
> rtl8169: oui 0x732 phyno 1, macv = 0x3c000000 phyv = 0x0002 
> #l0: rtl8169: 100Mbps port 0xD000 irq 10: 001fd0169891 
>
> the “100Mbps" in the message is correct or not? 
>
> I also feel rtl8169 is slow, so I replace on-board rtl8169 by intel’s card  
> if possible. 
>
>
>
> > 2016/02/18 22:22、erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> のメール: 
> > 
> > the 8169 driver is pretty fast.  I've measured it at more than 500mbps. 
> > it sounds like something else is misbehaving.  what does 
> > /dev/irqstat say.  I bet something is stuck. 
> > 
> > - erik 
> > 
> > 
> > On Feb 18, 2016 3:30 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Hello, 
> >> 
> >> I have finally managed to install plan9 on my new workstation. 
> >> 
> >> By putting back the keyboard on the PS2 connector, I have solved some 
> >> unfelicities (with the USB->legacy emulation, the keyboard switched 
> >> every other typing to UPPERCASE...). 
> >> 
> >> The mouse, still USB connected and hence "emulated" by the BIOS, 
> >> does not react very gracefully but I will see if I can play with 
> >> the acceleration and the resolution to have a better terminal. (Or 
> >> if I manage to find a long enough cable to have a COM slot back since 
> >> there is the bare connector on the motherboard; in this case I will go 
> >> back to a com mouse and will be able to probe USB for other 
> >> devices---external disks.) 
> >> 
> >> One thing is inconvenient: I have a rtl8169 gbe pci-e ether card, but 
> >> when testing the compilation of kerTeX (it has been fixed: it works for 
> >> the last release; rio to come for METAFONT), the throughput with hget is 
> >> abysmal: 30kB/s... The disk is not a fault, reacting well enough (I have 
> >> plenty of RAM and the blocks cache for fossil is set to 3000---it could 
> >> be obviously higher). 
> >> 
> >> Setting the mtu to jumbo packet does not help. 
> >> 
> >> Is there something to tune or is it simply that the chip is not well 
> >> supported? 
> >> 
> >> TIA 
> >> -- 
> >>         Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com> 
> >>                      http://www.kergis.com/ 
> >>                      http://www.arts-po.fr/ 
> >> Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C 
> >> 
> >> 
>
>
>

Reply via email to