do you remember the proposal? thanks
> El 24 jul 2017, a las 18:39, Erik Quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> escribió: > > I had a discussion with Richard about this a few years ago. Richard was no > longer convinced of the solution. at the time I agreed with his reasoning. > the comment should be changed. > > - erik > > > On Jul 24, 2017 9:03 AM, Giacomo Tesio <giac...@tesio.it> wrote: > In /sys/src/9/port/proc.c a comment state: > > /* > * Expects that only one process can call wakeup for any given Rendez. > * We hold both locks to ensure that r->p and p->r remain consistent. > * Richard Miller has a better solution that doesn't require both to > * be held simultaneously, but I'm a paranoid - presotto. > */ > > (see > https://github.com/0intro/plan9/blob/master/sys/src/9/port/proc.c#L882-L887) > > I'd like to know a bit more about Miller's solution as I'd like to simplify > postnote. > Any hint or source code? > > > Giacomo >
