On 9/1/18, Lucio De Re <lucio.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Trying it out, it fails to find "attach" and there is no clue where > that should come from. It did strike me as complex, but if it serves > an NFS filesystem, that is probably adequate. > > I'll wait to pass judgement for after I have it actually serving > anything at all. > I have made some progress, /tmp/9/ (the missing link, it seems) and /mnt/ now look the same, so presumably something is going on. Maybe the overengineering isn't too top-heavy, I need to check.
Lucio.
