On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Don A. Bailey wrote: > Tbf I took it as genuine. > > One reason I responded with no is that Rob noted that further 9 releases > should not be a release at all, but should be fluid updates through the > network. I think if 9 lives on it should be that was, as intended.
might want to focus on advice from people who use plan 9, instead > I am not a fan of the weird 9front split from the standard repo. I’d prefer > the sources to be managed by the foundation and would like to only receive > patches through them. what is weird about forking unmaintained software? khm ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T42f11e0265bcfa18-M560a8ff1936505596f57adb3 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
