Em 6 Dec 2004, Jack Campin escreveu: 

>> The code: 
>> (6abc``def 
>> is (normally) interpreted as 6 notes in the time of 2 notes. 
> 
>I know. It shouldn't be, that's nothing like normal musical practice. 

Really, you are correct. 

[snip] 

>Here are the results of my attempts to get round this. (It's 
>rhythmically more complicated than I thought at first - the 
>sextuplets are really 2+2+2, not 3+3, so it's a three-against- 
>two pattern throughout - I've revised the spacing to reflect 
>that). Taking just the first four bars of the upper voice: 

[snip] 

I use abcm2ps and abc2midi. With them, your examples 2,3,4, and 6 worked 
correctly. Macros are not implemented yet. 

> 
>Who on earth would expect the note lengths in (6abcdef to be different 
>from those in (3abc(3def ? This is just a glaring bug in the standard, 
>no pre-existing notation works that way. 

[snip] 

Really, (6 as (6:4:6 would be better than the current (6:2:6. 


Regards. 

Hudson Lacerda 

_________________________________________________________________________________
Quer mais velocidade?
Só com o acesso Aditivado iG, a velocidade que você quer na hora que você 
precisa.
Clique aqui: http://www.acessoaditivado.ig.com.br

Reply via email to