>>>>> "John" == John Henckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I think that cautionary accidentals are not musically significant.
John> Whether or not to include them is an editorial decision. However, it
John> seems that some people here are saying that in some cases cautionary
John> accidentals ARE musically significant.
No, I think what we're saying is that cautionary accidentals are easy
to confuse with editorial accidentals, which *are* musically
significant.
In my case, it's one of the things that makes lilypond easier to use
for my purposes than ABC -- I'm not willing to enter editorial
accidentals into my transcriptions unless I can distinguish them from
the ones in my sources.
--
Laura (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] , http://www.laymusic.org )
(Note the email and homepage address changes; please update your
address book, bookmarks, and links.)
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
