Bert van Vreckem wrote: > The committee in itself is a good idea [...], but if we want the > standard to go forward, there should be only one leader
OK, agreed. So can we decide on that and go forward? After what Guido wrote (quoted below) I feel he should be the leader. Guido wrote: > We're almost there. I'm finishing a document I named "A proposal of ABC > 2.0.0 standard"; it includes the latest 1.7.6 draft (verbatim), and adds > the least common denominator of multivoice support, low level details > (e.g. %%stuff), portability issues, some ABC examples, and so on. Then I > point out that there are details that inherently only make sense in > printed music, others in played music; I'm covering those too. > > To sum up, call me the coordinator if you wish; but bear in mind that > you're free to toss my work and dedication out of the window if you wish, > I'll not get upset. I just believe that with a bit of coordination - I did > nothing more than this - we'll soon have the new standard. Henrik Norbeck, Stockholm, Sweden [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.norbeck.nu/ My home page http://www.norbeck.nu/abcmus/ AbcMus player program http://www.norbeck.nu/abc/ >1900 ABC tunes http://www.norbeck.nu/blackthorn Irish trad music band http://www.rfod.se/folklink/ Links to Swedish trad music To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
