On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:32:34AM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Dvir Volk wrote: > > > The Washington Post story stated that RH has become profitable. so > > whatever the AOL strategy may be, it has at least a solid business logic > > to it, hasn't it? > > ummm... uhh... > > let's open my stock quote page... > > http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AOL+RHAT&d=t > > AOL $131bil Vs. RHAT $1.4bil in Market Cap. > Last Quarter RHAT lost $15mil, AOL lost $1.4bil.
Red Hat profits, depends on how you measure it. In any case its losses are mostly due to companies it owns losing value, and its basic business model is actually covering for that. So you could say it's doing pretty well and will continue to do better in the future even if the economy remains in its current condition. And even if it's not bought by AOL. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
