> I can think of one more approach that will give you better performance > (although it still won't be nearly as fast as the shared memory solution): > .NET remoting.
I'm sure others here can elaborate much better than I, but .net remotings seems to be heavily de-emphsized in Whidbey. Don Box was openly derisive of remoting and of the idea of strong typing across processes. Indigo will also have the ability to do a binary format of xml to dramtically reduce the overhead as I understood the presentation at the PDC. So, depending on your timing, you may want to consider how Whidbey might influence your decision. =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor� http://www.develop.com Some .NET courses you may be interested in: Guerrilla ASP.NET, 10 Nov 2003 in London and 26 Jan 2004, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnet Guerrilla .NET, 8 Dec 2003, in Los Angeles http://www.develop.com/courses/gdotnet View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
