I am surprised they have never broke even.  


From: Josh Luthman 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 4:02 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Cc: John Brewer ; ch...@go-mtc.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** Govt funded fiber - Utopia

Article: 
https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2024/04/19/government-internet-service-bad-for-taxpayers/

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 4:59 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com> wrote:

  By John Dougall

  For the Deseret News

  Most Utahns probably agree that government should stick to essential 
  government services and stay out of enterprises that are better performed by 
  the private sector.

  Yet, across the country and right here in Utah, more and more governments 
  are building government-owned internet networks, despite numerous 
  private-sector providers being available.

  The number of government-owned networks is increasing by the day, and 
  taxpayers, not users, are often footing the bill. Government-owned broadband 
  networks cost millions of dollars and divert essential funding away from 
  services that really matter to the public — services such as police and 
  fire, roads, water and sewer.

  Two unfortunate examples of government-owned broadband networks right here 
  in Utah are iProvo and UTOPIA.

  In 2004, Provo launched iProvo to provide broadband internet services to 
  homes and business. Provo reportedly bonded for $36.5 million to bring 
  service to every home in the city and wrote off $5.4 million that the city’s 
  telecommunications fund owed the Energy Department’s reserve fund to finance 
  the costly deployment. After struggling to make the network viable, iProvo 
  was sold in 2008. But its buyer failed to fulfill the terms of the sale, and 
  iProvo reverted back to the city. In 2013, in a desperate attempt to free 
  itself of the failed venture, the city ultimately sold iProvo to Google for 
  $1.

  Similarly, UTOPIA (Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency) was 
  launched to provide broadband internet services to a consortium of cities. 
  But UTOPIA has failed to fulfill its promises for more than two decades now. 
  The project, which started in 2002, was projected to be finished in three to 
  four years. Fast forward to today, and it is still incomplete. Not only is 
  UTOPIA incomplete, but the project has racked up $300 million worth of debt. 
  And despite iProvo’s example of failure, UTOPIA continues to expand.

  For years, UTOPIA consistently lost money, expecting taxpayers to cover 
  those losses. In addition to this, the government-owned network continues to 
  expand and pull other cities into this trap. What’s more egregious is that 
  UTOPIA misrepresented its performance as it pitched cities on buying into 
  the expansion fever. For example, UTOPIA once claimed the network had “no 
  cost to taxpayers since 2009.” This statement was patently inaccurate.

  As your watchdog, I help you to hold your government accountable. My office 
  investigated this and other claims, then we wrote a letter identifying these 
  inaccurate statements. We instructed UTOPIA to do the following:

  •Discard or destroy marketing materials with misleading statements.

  • Ensure future communications more accurately reflect the dependence on 
  taxpayer support.

  •Take steps to remedy the misrepresentations regarding the lack of taxpayer 
  support to any individual or entity that received the inaccurate 
  information.

  UTOPIA’s shortcomings do not stop there, however. Rather than providing 
  internet access to the more than 40,000 homes and small businesses that lack 
  internet access today, UTOPIA, like other government-owned networks, builds 
  redundant networks that compete with existing private providers, many who 
  are also regulated by the cities in which they operate.

  Unfortunately, iProvo and UTOPIA are no different from other 
  government-owned fiber networks across the country, which fail financially 
  about 90% of the time.

  When taxpayer money is being diverted from critical services into pet 
  broadband projects, that money is not going where it is needed most. 
  Taxpayers expect government to maintain roads, provide safe drinking water 
  and keep their communities safe. Money spent propping up broadband services 
  costs taxpayers money, encumbered by decades of debt, and deprives them of 
  important and sufficient government services they want and deserve. Plus, 
  higher taxes burden families, many of whom are struggling today just to 
  provide for themselves.

  Government-owned broadband has done enough harm to taxpayers. iProvo and 
  UTOPIA should be seen as an example for policymakers of what to avoid. 
  Public officials across the country, and especially here in Utah, should 
  resist the appealing allure of expanding or deploying government-owned 
  networks, which allure has been shown to be deceptive, and ultimately 
  destructive, to taxpayers.

  John Dougall is the Utah State Auditor and is a candidate for Utah’s 3rd 
  congressional district.



  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to