Everything’s political now, of course.

 

But he does have a point when he says “Government-owned broadband networks cost 
millions of dollars and divert essential funding away from services that really 
matter to the public — services such as police and fire, roads, water and 
sewer.”

 

In the past, the government has undertaken vast programs at taxpayer expense 
like rural electrification, the interstate highway system, the space program.  
Now apparently high speed Internet is the thing of the moment that takes 
precedence over all the other broken things that we might wish government to 
fix.  I sometimes wonder why Internet?  Maybe because it seems easy and gives 
people the power to hand out billions of dollars.  Could they cure cancer or 
get lead out of drinking water or fix all the deteriorating bridges with 
something like a BEAD program?

 

Maybe they think broadband and AI and neural implants will lead to a future 
where everyone is plugged into the network and doesn’t need any of those other 
things.  Maybe we’ll all be heads in jars like in Futurama.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via AF
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 5:38 PM
To: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>; AnimalFarm Microwave Users 
Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Cc: ch...@go-mtc.com; John Brewer <n7...@me.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Govt funded fiber - Utopia

 

I am surprised they have never broke even.  

 

 

 

From: Josh Luthman 

Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 4:02 PM

To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 

Cc: John Brewer ; ch...@go-mtc.com <mailto:ch...@go-mtc.com>  

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ***SPAM*** Govt funded fiber - Utopia

 

Article: 
https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2024/04/19/government-internet-service-bad-for-taxpayers/

 

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 4:59 PM Chuck McCown via AF <af@af.afmug.com 
<mailto:af@af.afmug.com> > wrote:

By John Dougall

For the Deseret News

Most Utahns probably agree that government should stick to essential 
government services and stay out of enterprises that are better performed by 
the private sector.

Yet, across the country and right here in Utah, more and more governments 
are building government-owned internet networks, despite numerous 
private-sector providers being available.

The number of government-owned networks is increasing by the day, and 
taxpayers, not users, are often footing the bill. Government-owned broadband 
networks cost millions of dollars and divert essential funding away from 
services that really matter to the public — services such as police and 
fire, roads, water and sewer.

Two unfortunate examples of government-owned broadband networks right here 
in Utah are iProvo and UTOPIA.

In 2004, Provo launched iProvo to provide broadband internet services to 
homes and business. Provo reportedly bonded for $36.5 million to bring 
service to every home in the city and wrote off $5.4 million that the city’s 
telecommunications fund owed the Energy Department’s reserve fund to finance 
the costly deployment. After struggling to make the network viable, iProvo 
was sold in 2008. But its buyer failed to fulfill the terms of the sale, and 
iProvo reverted back to the city. In 2013, in a desperate attempt to free 
itself of the failed venture, the city ultimately sold iProvo to Google for 
$1.

Similarly, UTOPIA (Utah Telecommunications Open Infrastructure Agency) was 
launched to provide broadband internet services to a consortium of cities. 
But UTOPIA has failed to fulfill its promises for more than two decades now. 
The project, which started in 2002, was projected to be finished in three to 
four years. Fast forward to today, and it is still incomplete. Not only is 
UTOPIA incomplete, but the project has racked up $300 million worth of debt. 
And despite iProvo’s example of failure, UTOPIA continues to expand.

For years, UTOPIA consistently lost money, expecting taxpayers to cover 
those losses. In addition to this, the government-owned network continues to 
expand and pull other cities into this trap. What’s more egregious is that 
UTOPIA misrepresented its performance as it pitched cities on buying into 
the expansion fever. For example, UTOPIA once claimed the network had “no 
cost to taxpayers since 2009.” This statement was patently inaccurate.

As your watchdog, I help you to hold your government accountable. My office 
investigated this and other claims, then we wrote a letter identifying these 
inaccurate statements. We instructed UTOPIA to do the following:

•Discard or destroy marketing materials with misleading statements.

• Ensure future communications more accurately reflect the dependence on 
taxpayer support.

•Take steps to remedy the misrepresentations regarding the lack of taxpayer 
support to any individual or entity that received the inaccurate 
information.

UTOPIA’s shortcomings do not stop there, however. Rather than providing 
internet access to the more than 40,000 homes and small businesses that lack 
internet access today, UTOPIA, like other government-owned networks, builds 
redundant networks that compete with existing private providers, many who 
are also regulated by the cities in which they operate.

Unfortunately, iProvo and UTOPIA are no different from other 
government-owned fiber networks across the country, which fail financially 
about 90% of the time.

When taxpayer money is being diverted from critical services into pet 
broadband projects, that money is not going where it is needed most. 
Taxpayers expect government to maintain roads, provide safe drinking water 
and keep their communities safe. Money spent propping up broadband services 
costs taxpayers money, encumbered by decades of debt, and deprives them of 
important and sufficient government services they want and deserve. Plus, 
higher taxes burden families, many of whom are struggling today just to 
provide for themselves.

Government-owned broadband has done enough harm to taxpayers. iProvo and 
UTOPIA should be seen as an example for policymakers of what to avoid. 
Public officials across the country, and especially here in Utah, should 
resist the appealing allure of expanding or deploying government-owned 
networks, which allure has been shown to be deceptive, and ultimately 
destructive, to taxpayers.

John Dougall is the Utah State Auditor and is a candidate for Utah’s 3rd 
congressional district.



-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to