Yeah, it's a bit of a worry. By the way, if anybody is trying to look it up, I spelt the guy's name wrong, it's actually "Stirling's equation". You can find it in an online book here:
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itprnn/book.html It's a great book, about 640 pages long. The result I used is equation 1.13 which is on page 2. Shane --- Brad Wyble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's also disconcerting that something like this can make it through the > review process. > > Transdisciplinary is oftentimes a pseudonym for combining half-baked and > ill-formed ideas from multiple domains into an incoherent mess. > > This paper is an excellent example. (bad math + bad neuroscience != good > paper) > > > > > > ------- > To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, > please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
