Howdy Shane,
I'll try to put my views in your format....
I think that
Extremely powerful, vastly superhuman AGI ==> outstanding Hutter test result
whereas
Human-level AGI =/=> Good Hutter test result
just as
Human =/=> Good Hutter test result
and for this reason I consider the Hutter test a deeply flawed
benchmark test to apply to systems on the path of gradually improving,
vaguely humanlike general intelligence.
Next, I think that appropriately-constructed narrow-AI systems will be
able to outperform nearly all human-level AGI systems on the Hutter
test.
I.e., in your format, this means I feel that
Good (e.g. winning) Hutter test result =/=> powerful AGI
However, I am uncertain whether
Amazingly outstanding Hutter test result ==> powerful AGI
Is that clear?
-- Ben
On 8/12/06, Shane Legg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben,
So you think that,
Powerful AGI ==> good Hutter test result
But you have a problem with the reverse implication,
good Hutter test result =/=> Powerful AGI
Is this correct?
Shane
________________________________
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription, please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
