Eric Baum wrote: > As I and Jef and you appear to agree, extant Intelligence > works because it exploits structure *of our world*; there is > and can be (unless P=NP or some such radical and unlikely > possibility) no such thing as as "General" Intelligence that > works in all worlds.
I'm going to risk being misunderstood again over a subtle point of clarification: I think we are in practical agreement on the point quoted above, but I think that a more coherent view would avoid the binary distinction and instead place general intelligence at the end of a scale where with diminishing exploitation of regularities in the environment computational requirements become increasingly intractable. - Jef ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
