On 10/21/07, Pei Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The difference between NARS and PLN has much more to do with their > different semantics, than with their different logical/algebraic > formalism.
Sure; in both cases, the algebraic structure of the rules and the truth-value formulas follow from the semantics For example, according to the semantics of NARS, Bayes rule, with all > of its variants, is deduction. Therefore it is impossible to use on > induction/abduction/... For the benefit of others besides Pei ... what I meant was that inferences like A --> B A --> C |- B --> C and A --> C B --> C |- A --> B are handled in PLN via a combination of Bayes rule and deduction, whereas in NARS they are handled by special induction and abduction truth value formulas... -- Ben ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=56156686-9d128e
