> This is a general theorem about *strings* in this formal system, but > no such string with uncomputable real number can ever be written, so > saying that it's a theorem about uncomputable real numbers is an empty > set theory (it's a true statement, but it's true in a trivial > "falsehood, therefore Mars is inhabited by little green men" kind of > formal sense).
Well, but NO uncomputable number can be written, so which theorems about uncomputable numbers are NOT empty in the sense you mean? ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
