Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Hmmmm.... I detect a parody..?

 That is not what I intended to say.


No, as horrible as it may sound, this is how I see the problem that
you are trying to address. If you can pinpoint some specific errors in
my description, without reiterating the whole description once again,
that would probably be helpful.


On a second reading, the description of my propsoed paradigm is not that inaccurate, it just emphasizes some things and de-emphasizes others, thereby making the whole thing look weird.

I'll elaborate later.



Richard Loosemore

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to