> From: BillK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I agree. I support more type 1 discussions. > > I have felt for some time that an awful lot of time-wasting has been > going on here. > > I think this list should mostly be for computer tech discussion about > methods of achieving specific results on the path(s) to AGI. > > I agree that there should be a place for philosophical discussion, > either on a separate list, or uniquely identified in the Subject so > that technicians can filter off such discussions. > > Some people may need to discuss philosophic alternative paths to AGI, > to help clarify their thoughts. But if so, they are probably many > years away from producing working code and might be hindering others > who are further down the path of their own design. > > Two lists are probably best. Then if technicians want a break from > coding, they can dip into the philosophy list, to offer advice or > maybe find new ideas to play with. > And, as John said. it would save on moderation time. > >
Yes and someone else could be moderator for type 2 list, someone could be nominated. Then Ben could be the super mod and reign in when he has a bad day :) I nominate Tinter. Just kidding. John ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
