On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The main problem is that if you interpret spike timing to be playing the > role that you (and they) imply above, then you are commiting yourself to a > whole raft of assumptions about how knowledge is generally represented and > processed. However, there are *huge* problems with that set of implicit > assumptions .... not to put too fine a point on it, those implicit > assumptions are equivalent to the worst, most backward kind of cognitive > theory imaginable. A theory that is 30 or 40 years out of date. >
Could you give some references to be specific in what you mean? Examples of what you consider outdated cognitive theory and better cognitive theory. -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
