On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Jim Bromer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think my criticism of Hutter's theorem may not have been that >> strong. I do think that Hutter's theorem may shed some light on why >> the problem is difficult. More importantly it helps us to think >> outside the box. For instance, it might be the case that an effective >> AI program cannot be completely defined. It might need to be >> constantly changing, in that the program itself can never be defined. >> I am not saying that is the case, just that it is a possibility....
> Was this text even supposed to be coherent? > > -- > Vladimir Nesov Yes. Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
