>If hardware manufactures wanted their products to have good support on >Linux, all they have to do is publish the hardware programming details, and >the linux community will do the actual driver development.
thats why i wrote "inertia-bound companies". they don't see this. they think that linux support means more of an investment. it can do, of course, but it doesn't have to. they also don't understand that if someone else writes a GPL'ed driver, *they* can take a copy later and work it (or a fork, if necessary) back into their newly-emerging "official" linux support. --p _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
