Thanks Mark

The fact is that tests=[...] are not always same,
when is spam there are a lot of tests listed
when is not spam, only 2-3 testes are listes

I'd like to know if there is a way to make that tests were listes, no matters 
a value of 0 (or I must assume that if is not listes its because value is 
zero?)

LD


Le Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:18:10 Mark Martinec, vous avez écrit :
> Luis,
>
> > The question is how to tell amavis that always put califications of
> > all tests.  Or does amavis use a cut-circuit and not all tests are done?
>
> It does put the complete list of tests as provided by SpamAssassin
> into the X-Spam-Status: ...tests=[...] header field.
> No short-circuiting or truncation is done by amavisd.
>
> > $sa_tag_level_deflt = -10;
>
> Setting it to undef is more universal, always inserts X-Spam-*
> header fields:
>   $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
> > If a clean email:
> > X-Spam-Flag: NO
> > X-Spam-Score: -2.553
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-10 required=0.5
> >         tests=[AWL=0.347, BAYES_00=-2.599, DKIM_VERIFIED=-0.3,
> >         SPF_PASS=-0.001]
> >
> > The fact is I'd like that test headers were added no matters if is a spam
> > or not.
>
> The 'tests=[AWL=0.347, BAYES...SPF_PASS=-0.001]'  _is_ a complete list.
>
> > The fact is I'd like that test headers were added no matters if is a spam
> > or not.  I'm interested in DCC and PYZOR.  If I run spamassassin from
> > command line it seems that headers are added:
> >
> > X-Spam-Level: ********************************
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=32.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DCC_CHECK,
> >         DIGEST_MULTIPLE,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,HTML_MESSAGE,PYZOR_CHECK,
> >        
> > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RCVD_IN_XBL,SPF_HELO_PASS,
> > URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL
> > autolearn=spam version=3.1.9
> > X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 193342 times.
>
> I see, you want the X-Spam-Pyzor header field. That is not currently
> possible, amavisd does its own header section editing, and caters only for
> a more common set of X-Spam-* header fields. If a SA plugin provides a tag
> value (in SA terminology, e.g. such as provided by
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL, these strings can be obtained through
> supplementary_info access mechanism in amavisd. The X-Spam-Pyzor is a bit
> harder to get to, a hack would be needed.
>
>   Mark
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> AMaViS-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
> AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
> AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

Reply via email to