On Monday, August 09, 2004 7:09 PM [GMT], Uriel Wittenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aengus, > > Thanks for the reply! > > I did what you said; found my DNS server; re-ran qdns, specifying it. > > This time qdns was not so quick. When it was done I looked at the new > dns file. Almost the same thing! 266 lines all similar to: > > 18202433 68.208.4.19 * Unfortunately, that IP address doesn't have a reverse lookup, so that doesn't indicate a problem. I just ran qdns against a 50MB logfile, with over 100,000 entries, and it completed in a couple of minutes. I also have to specify the DNS file on the command line. C:\analog>qdns /d dns.dns /l ex040805.log /y 192.168.4.41 AnalogX QuickDNS (QDNS) - Quick DNS version 2.00 (Release) [08/12/2000] The latest version is always available at http://www.analogx.com/ DNS IP Set to 10.135.129.141 Unable to open DNS file 'dns.dns' 0 [ 0.0400 secs] DNS Entries loaded... 1965 [ 23.2530 secs] Log Entries loaded... (114101) 1965 [ 5.6880 secs] Queued for lookup... 1965 [ 96.2790 secs] Entries processed (1965 resolved)... 1965 [ 0.0400 secs] Entries saved... 1965 [ 125.3100 secs] Completed (-1965 unresolved)... A full Host report actually shows 1958 entries, of which 437 are unresolved, so the "(-1965 unresolved)" is a bit misleading. If I ask Analog to resolve the same log file, I expect that it would take considerably longer than just a few minutes. As I said, qdns has always been a bit quirky. You might want to try one of the others. Aengus +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
