But you would hope the number of developers voting would be significantly less than number of random users. And unfortunately, they very well might not think "Oh, this could have something to do with the recent update" and skip. They'll just give a 1 star.
- Dan On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:05 PM, polyclefsoftware <dja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That makes sense. I knew we could skip installation of apps, but > didn't know I could skip voting as well. > > I'll do that from now on. > > I haven't tested my entry under 1.6, so I don't know if there are > issues. Your average user probably won't care if it doesn't work > because of the OS version, though. They'll just care if it works or > not. > > On Oct 2, 10:20 am, Cédric Berger <cedric.berge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 16:18, polyclefsoftware <dja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > it is poorly designed, or because of compatibility issues with 1.6. I > > > gave the developers the benefit of the doubt and gave the app an > > > overall 3 star rating. > > > > Best (fairest) thing to do when you suspect behavior may have been > > impacted by Donut, is to just skip voting for it. > > > > This way your vote won't count at all and those with cupcake will > > still vote for the "real" cupcake behavior. > > And this should still leave plenty of applications working ok with > > Donut that you can vote for. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
