> I don't believe so. A smaller number of qualified testers would yield > a more reliable result than a huge number of people who do not know > how to develop software. No one will concede to the developer that the > app crashes because of Donut - in fact, he can't tell whether it's the > app or the operating system - s/he will just give 1 star. > > But that's the way it works with Google - let the developers work for > nothing and have the mob blame them.
In my opinion this is plane wrong. An applications is mainly used by none developers and thats why the response from a simple user counts a lot more. It is also one of the main principles how you should develop an application. You need to develop for the user and not for you. It is very often not easy to know what the user actually wants most, thats for sure *g*. You can for example create the most powerful command line tool for file management with cool batch features and automation just like you would like it as a old style programmer coming from a unix background. But the user will most likely prefer the simple windows explorer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
