I would be extremely happy to have the chance to submit an updated app, but I agree that it is most fair overall to stick to the original rules -- no updates.
Seems like Google screwed up quite a bit on this -- either that or it was a conscious choice to focus on moving forward to 1.6 in preparation for the next round of devices to be released in the near future. Hacking off developers is not a good idea, but I imagine they are balancing a lot of competing interests. That being said, the whole ADC2 process has been somewhat disappointing so far. Winning could probably change my mind, though :) On Oct 6, 10:11 pm, Rud <rudmerr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, my game appears to work okay under 1.6. But I do have a bug that > I would like to fix before it goes into round 2, assuming it does. I'd > not like to see someone get a chance to slip in bug fixes with a 1.6 > fix when I don't have the opportunity to fix my bug. > > Rudhttp://www.mysticlakesoftware.com > > On Oct 6, 4:33 pm, CraigsRace <craig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Allowing an app update would go against their own rules, so it would > > be very controversial. Having said that, IMO, I wouldn't mind if they > > did allow it for broken apps only (which I imagine are only a select > > few). > > > On Oct 7, 5:40 am, Hong <lordh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I agree it's due to the Donut update that broke quite a few apps there. > > > Wouldn't surprise me if they allow an app update for the next round.- > > > Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
