Hi, I wonder why
::sha1::sha1 "hashing is fun" (http://expect.nist.gov/sha1pure/ from Don Libes, and standard tcl library) produces b9ff9778b351918b01deebd508cae98a558bfe01 whereas ns_sha1 "hashing is fun" produces (ns_sha1 from sourceforge) B9FF9778B351918B01DEEBD508CAE98A558BFE01 the hash in upper chars. What's "correct"? Kind regards, Bernd.
