Hi,

I wonder why

::sha1::sha1 "hashing is fun"
(http://expect.nist.gov/sha1pure/ from Don Libes,
and standard tcl library)

produces

b9ff9778b351918b01deebd508cae98a558bfe01

whereas

ns_sha1 "hashing is fun" produces
(ns_sha1 from sourceforge)

B9FF9778B351918B01DEEBD508CAE98A558BFE01

the hash in upper chars.

What's "correct"?

Kind regards,
Bernd.

Reply via email to