Hmm, I haven't looked at the existing (pre 1.1) functionality in much detail, so I can't really comment. I might get chance of the next day or two, but can anyone else save me the trouble and confirm whether these things are functionally equivalent?

Andrew Piskorski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:25:20AM +0000, Simon Millward wrote:

PS/ I beleive pipelining offers significant efficiency improvements for
SSL connections, i.e. its allows these connections to stay alive,
removing a significant per-request overhead. This is very salient in

I'm all for HTTP 1.1 support as well, but doesn't AOLserver already
support "pipelineing" in the form of the pre-1.1 "keepalive" feature?
What's the difference between the two?

--
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.piskorski.com

.


--
Simon Millward
Director
OpenMSG Limited
+44 (0) 7818 045 801

Tel: +44 (0)1225 48 48 05   Fax: +44 (0)1225 31 6789   Web http://www.open-msg.net
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of OpenMSG Ltd.

Reply via email to