On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I wanted to kick off a discussion, I think that with the work that
>> > Seneca is doing for armv6hl to support the Raspberry Pi most of the
>> > need for building sfp has gone away. I would like us to drop support
>> > for sfp in F19 that means that anyone running a kirkwood based system
>> > would get supported software updates for approximately 13 months from
>> > now. with cubie boards and other devices coming around that are cheap
>> > and more powerful and similar options I think there is little benefit
>> > to continuing to support sfp.
>>
>> I'm not overly familiar with arm, but from a kernel standpoint you might
>> be able to enable floating point emulation. That would let you run the
>> hardfp binaries on the boards without an FPU.
>
> No, you can't.

OK.

> The only FP emulation the ARM kernel provide is for the antique FPA
> instruction set that almost never got implemented in hardware, except
> for a few exceptions that Linux never supported anyway.

Ah.  See, that would be where I point back to me knowning almost nothing
about ARM ;).

> All modern EABI compliant binaries are using the VFP instruction set,
> and the only thing the kernel implements is the processing of
> exceptions for them.  To have a full VFP emulation support in the
> kernel, significant development effort would be needed.

I find this slightly interesting to be honest.  In the embedded powerpc
world, math emulation is used as a last ditch effort but it does exist.
I would have thought the proliferation of ARM devices would generate some
amount of interest in getting similar support in-kernel, but apparently
not.

Anyway, I'm not opposed to dropping a kernel variant at all.  Makes some
things simpler.

josh
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Reply via email to