Once the dust settles here and there is more of a reliable build/install recipe available, I'll have a closer look, but so far this sounds great !

I am not sure how the faxing standards interfaces are exposed right now to asterisk, but I think rather than reinvent the wheel as far as the managing of inbound and outbound faxing, the software fax itself should be exposed as one of the "standard" modem types derived from the original Hayes command set. While this may not be the most efficient way to interact with the driver, it has the benefit of working with a wide selection of software that is already mature. (Hylafax being one of them).


At 05:15 PM 10/20/2003, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 14:19, Florian Overkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Citeren Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If it doesn't work for you, don't be too surprised. Feed back anything
> > you find, and lets try to make things better. I suspect, from experience
> > and things I have read on the web, that a lot of fax machines do not
> > follow the standards very well. In that case, a number of tweaks are
> > probably needed before this new software is adequately tolerant of the
> > behaviour of real world machines.
>
> First off, let me start by saying I think this is a great new step that is
> greatly appreciated (at least by me) toward a complete telephony platform.
>
> Second off, I just tried to build and install. Some comments up till now:
>
> - The compilation process asks for libaudiofile headerfiles (-dev package) -
> this was not default on my box. Should be added to documentation I guess :)
>
> - On my Debian box libtiff is an empty package (sucks) so I downloaded the
> tiff package source code. Installation here sucks once more: the mentioned
> tiffiop.h is not installed in /usr/local/include as I suppose it should, same
> goes for several other header files. Easiest was to just point the Makefile in
> your src/ tree toward the libtiff source.


Wasn't empty on my machine, but also the headers didn't get installed. I
apt-get source the package, and then copied the files into places where
they could be used.

> - The linker tries to access fftw (Fourier libraries). Not default installed
> on my system, should probably be added to documentation


Noticed bug in package where libfftw.so wasn't linked to the
libfftw.so.2 file. This caused me a few moments of grief, but is a
package maintainers fault not Steve's.

> - The linker tries to access unicall. What is this ? Not installed on my
> system and no candidates on my searchlist (apt-get and a quick google search).
> How to continue ?


Same here. add to that no libmfcr2. Only link I noticed for it is
discussion of the R2 protocol. Makes me wonder why it is being used at
all. I ended up removing these 2 from the LIBS line in the tests
Makefile and it doesn't seem to be a problem yet. Still building.

> Thanks, and I hope to continue this adventure soon :-)
--
Steven Critchfield  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to