From: "Jeremy McNamara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I would like to hear from anyone else that has real world experiences with both chan_h323 and asterisk-oh323.
Be brutal. I want to know the gory details, so we can stop any future pissing matches from even starting by having everything publicly documented for all newbies.
Jeremy McNamara
I've used both, I find chan_h323 more robust as it does less. Given it uses *'s rtp, means less chance of errors but also inherits problems of rtp.c (inability to set payload) My chan_oh323 still crashes on exit which concerns me on the quality. (I don't really care if it's on exit). Having
So lets fix it! I use asterisk-oh323 without problems for my setup. If you provide the needed information I can fix it.
said that, the config options in chan_oh323 are great - the ability to turn on and off fast start and change the packet payload sizes is handy. My main problem with chan_h323 was G.729, which caused me switching to chan_oh323
I'm using chan_oh323 to pass through many G.729 calls to/from Cisco 17xx boxes without a single problem.
but given my patch has been added, that problem is solved. Speaking of patches, an unknown feature I submitted was nat=true (same as sip.conf) for chan_h323. I haven't heard anyone using this so let me know if it does or doesn't work.
-Adam
Michael.
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
